Back Pain is not from Evolution
As stated here several times, many believers in particle-to-pachyderm evolution misrepresent biblical creationists in saying that we believe "GodDidIt" and scientific investigation is over. Not hardly! Creation scientists want to know how God did something, and how things work.
Meanwhile, evolutionists making such accusations are hypocritical. "It evolved" is a common explanation when empirical data are not available, and they appeal to evolution when something is not actually understood. Evolution is a science stopper — dangerously so in medical science. This is displayed in how they evosplain lower back pain.
![]() |
Doctor examines woman's back, Pexels / Kaboompics |
Secular scientists have long excused the epidemic of low back pain in Western society on evolution. One evolutionist, Michael Sims, made it a centerpiece of his discussion. In a chapter of his 2003 book Adam's Navel: A Natural and Cultural History of the Human Form, subtitled, “Two Legs Good and Bad, ” he discussed the advantages of bipedal walking, but asserted that one major problem resulting from the transition from quadrupedal to bipedal locomotion in humans was pain, especially back pain. Sims assumed that this transition actually occurred, and then made it central to his postulate about disadvantages in walking upright on two legs:
To read the article in its entirety, see "Ape Evolution Did Not Cause Back Pain in Humans." It's time for me to go for a walk in the woods and get some pictures.