People believe in evolution because they want to, not because valid scientific evidence compels acceptance of that conclusion. Funny how evolutionists fawn all over Papa Darwin and claim he was a "great scientist", whose training was in theology. He gave them false scientific validity to "support" their disbelief in God. After all, if there is no God, there are no ultimate rules and we can do whatever we want without penalty (unless we get caught).
Take Lucy for example. Please. This critter was touted as one of your evolutionary ancestors. Truth is, knuckle-walking Loocy has been 'splained as being closely related to a bonobo ("pygmy chimp").
Another interesting item that they brought up is Java Man. This bad boy was manufactured in 1891. Assorted bone fragments were found over a relatively large area, and not at the same time. It is not taken seriously as a transitional form.
I'll dispense with some of the other follies of the fake evolutionary parade —
Well, I should include Nebraska Man.
Did he play for the Cornhuskers? Nope. Another serious mistake, because not only was "Nebraska Man" built entirely from a single tooth, the tooth belonged to that of an extinct pig. Evolutionists make excuses about this major blunder, that it was made out of complex circumstances. But shouldn't "science" be above such things? Well, not when promoting something they "know" is right at all costs.
Here is a much more technical piece for your perusal. It's from a creationist perspective, so I know that intellectual cowards won't touch it — because if they did examine the evidence without an evolutionary presupposition, they just might take away a very different conclusion.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some embryo drawings to make and peppered moths to glue down. "Willingly Deceived By Evolution Part 2" is here, with comics, pictures and things.