Birds, Bats, and the Bible
It is not uncommon for Bible deniers to find excuses to justify their rebellion, but some go further and machinate alleged contradictions and absurdities. These are usually framed as "Gotcha!" statements and questions. They occasionally raise questions that some believers also want answered.
One tinhorn, geology professor Ian Plimer, wrote a (now out of print) book called Telling Lies for God: Reason vs Creationism. Aside from the clear bias, he made himself a liar and CMI set the record straight. Jimmy Li has a resource refuting hundreds of such claims. Then there are bats as birds?
![]() |
| Flying fruit bat, Flickr / Tambako The Jaguar (CC BY-ND 2.0) |
In Leviticus 11, the Lord revealed to Moses and Aaron which animals the Israelites were permitted to eat and which animals were forbidden under the Mosaic law. Certain verses in this chapter seem to contain some basic biological blunders, such as the bat being called a bird. Skeptics have seized on these types of alleged errors in their efforts to undercut the doctrine of biblical inerrancy. Let’s take a closer look at this supposed problem to see why this passage is not in error.
To see why the Creator is not in error and to learn about the ostrich question, visit "Does the Bible Blunder Biology?"
