Origin of Life Stories Continually Convoluted

Darwin's disciples often insist that the origin of life has nothing to do with evolution, the two are separate concepts. So, abiogenesis — life from non-life, also called chemical evolution — has nothing to do with dust-to-Doctor-Doom evolution. Actually, they want creationists to give them a boost over that hurdle.

Meanwhile, there is a great deal of research happening on the origin of life. Much of the research involves torturing the evidence until it "supports" the latest narrative of evolutionists. Dr. James Tour, an Intelligent Design supporter, says they are clueless about the origin of life.

The tales told are convoluted because one thing leads to another. Secularists have to go back to their creation myths and a molten Earth, then stumble forward through time. If evidence could speak, it might say, "Yes, but..." numerous times. Facts interrupt the stories, and more stories are developed, the OoL history keeps getting rewritten in the name of science. The truth is, the science does not hold up but the evidence for recent creation certainly does.

Our planet earth, as the conventional evolutionary story goes, formed from coalescing hot material that flung out from the solar nebula some 4.57 billion years ago.1 Initially, the surface covering this coalesced material was a global hot magma ocean. Eventually, the surface supposedly became a newly formed, barren wasteland of sharp rocks, strewn with lava flows from erupting volcanoes. The air was fuming with unbreathable gases. There was little or no liquid water. Just as things were starting to settle down, a barrage of meteorites tens of kilometers across came pummeling down from space, obliterating entire landscapes and sending vast plumes of debris high into the sky.

To read the rest, see "The Shifting Sand of Life’s Origin Story."