A Brief View of the Big Bang Myth
The prevalent myth of the secular science industry for the origin of the universe is commonly called the Big Bang, which is buggy. Even so, believers in dust-to-dictator evolution support it. This is most likely because the work of the Creator is contrary to their paradigms.
Angry atheists on teh interwebs are ignorant of (or unwilling to admit) that there are scientists, both conventional and creationists, who reject the Big Bang. Indeed, it has been frequently Frankensteined by adding inflation and other faith-based concepts to keep it looking respectable.
![]() | |
|
According to the most popular conventional origins story, space, energy, time, and matter as we know them came into being 14 billion years ago when a hypothetical process called inflation caused space to rapidly expand. Somehow this cosmic accident eventually resulted in myriads of stars, planets, and galaxies as well as Earth and all its inhabitants. Despite the idea’s apparent absurdity, it’s taken seriously by millions of people, including most scientists.The Big Bang’s three main supporting arguments are (1) the redshifts of distant galaxies, which are seen as evidence for an expanding universe; (2) the Big Bang’s ability to account for the amounts of hydrogen and helium in the universe; and (3) the existence of a cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation that’s said to be an afterglow from about 400,000 years after the Big Bang happened.
To read the rest of this short article, click on "The Big Bang Myth."
