Still no Population III Stars for the Big Bang
A popular internet saying among folks who reject the Big Bang is, "In the beginning, there was nothing. Which exploded." While some supporters downplay the explosion which supposedly began everything, they affirm the Frankensteined-in cosmic inflation — which is not even a hypothesis.
After the secular miracle of the Big Bang, the universe rapidly expanded and stars formed. These were primarily hydrogen and helium. Stars grew old, blew up, scattered debris, formulated the other elements, and all that good stuff. Those first stars formed are called population III.
![]() |
| Artist’s impression, field of Population III stars, NOIRLab / NSF / AURA J. da Silva / Spaceengine / M. Zamani (CC BY 4.0) |
As I’ve explained before, astronomers have long looked for hypothetical population III stars, stars with no elements other than hydrogen and helium. According to the big bang model, the universe began with just hydrogen, helium, and a trifling amount of lithium. All the other elements, such as the oxygen and nitrogen we breathe, the iron in our blood, and the calcium in our bones, were synthesized in the cores of stars as the source of energy for the luminous output of the stars. Supernovae and other mechanisms spew the products of these nuclear reactions into space, where it mixes with the gas already there to produce more stars.
To read the entire article, expand your horizons to "Once Again: Have Astronomers Found the Hypothetical Population III Stars?"
