Evolutionary Truth by Piltdown Superman

Welcome to the home of The Question Evolution Project. Presenting information demonstrating that there is no truth in minerals-to-man evolution, and presenting evidence for special creation. —Established by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Even Water is Designed!

If you think on it for a spell, you might realize that people who have plentiful water take it for granted. This here planet that our Creator gave us to look after is just over two thirds water. Interesting that we ourselves are also two thirds water. Sure, some of it is mix in with other fluids, but those fluids rely on water to keep us alive. Evolutionists who search for life on other worlds primarily focus on whether or not those places could sustain water, since it is necessary for life.

Water itself was designed by the Master Engineer
Credit: Freeimages / shivani
If y'all don't mind, I'd like to have you to think a bit further. Ever wonder where it came from? I'm not talking about clouds, rivers, and things. Before that. Dumb luck at the alleged cosmic evolution of the solar system? Not hardly! Water has many characteristics, such as its chemical composition, density, surface tension, heat capacity, viscosity, and so on. Even though the logic indicates that water, as well as life itself, was designed by the Master Engineer. Of course. some folks kick at the goads and refuse to admit the truth.
Water, the most abundant compound on earth, perhaps in the solar system, has so many properties that make it truly remarkable especially in regard to making the planet habitable and life possible. Each of the following properties discussed here clearly shows that water is purposefully designed for making the earth habitable. 
. . . 
Water is commonly referred to as the matrix of life. Its versatility and peculiar properties make it uniquely suitable for life; it is unrivaled by any other liquid. For this purpose, almost all biochemical reactions take place in water. It is necessary, then, to take a look at the structure of water and how this structure gives rise to the properties of water that make it uniquely suitable for life.
To read the entire article, splashdown at "God’s Flawless Design of Water Makes Life Possible". 

Question Evolution Day

Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!

Monday, January 22, 2018

Jurassic Coast Propaganda Playground Fails

Several places around the globe have interesting geological features, and are used as icons for deep time and Darwinism. As expected, they give a slanted view of what is seen, but leave out important information. A nice patch of land in England has been named the Jurassic Coast, and is rife with secular propaganda (as well as some fabulous scenery). Looks like a great place for a stroll.

England's "Jurassic Coast" is rife with secular propaganda for deep time but the facts support the global Genesis Flood
Credit: Pixabay / diego_torres
The secular view of uniformitarian geology is heavily promoted, but does not explain the features. Some problems are the erosion layers, rate of cliff retreat, planation surfaces, and more. The evidence is best explained by the Genesis Flood, including the presence of fossils, which require rapid burial. Watch for evolutionary and deep time propaganda, old son. They are not giving you all the facts, nor the most reasonable explanation. Secularists need to cowboy up and realize that the world was created recently, and that's why all their speculations don't hold up to scrutiny.
Numerous geological sites across the world present the story of evolution, uniformitarianism, and rocks millions of years old. One popular site is the Jurassic Coast in southwest England, where millions of people a year visit and take a ‘185 million year walk through time’.1 However, the discerning tourist can readily see another interpretation from the rocks and fossils, namely evidence of rapid burial through many conformable (continuously deposited) sedimentary layers, which is far better explained by the Genesis Flood.
To read the rest, journey over to "The Jurassic Coast—Icon for the Genesis Flood".

Question Evolution Day

Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!

Saturday, January 20, 2018

Male Health and Genetic Entropy

Adherents of universal common ancestor evolution rely on atheistic interpretations of scientific facts, and they have a special fondness for geoscience. Evolutionists need the earth to be ancient, so secular geologists and paleontologists give Darwin the long ages he needs to perform his miracles. Many evidences for a young earth, using secularist methods, are largely ignored. One of these evidences for a recent creation is in biology. Specifically, genetics.

Genetic entropy is more pronounced in males, and humans cannot be as old as Darwinists want to believe
Credit: National Human Genome Research Institute
(Usage does not imply endorsement of site contents)
Evolutionists are enamored with studying fruit flies, since they can induce mutations and variations (but cannot get anything other than freaky fruit flies). The science around mutations in fruit flies also applies to humans. Specifically, the Y chromosome in human males. Yes, really. Males have the a Y chromosome, and females have two X chromosomes. There's more possibility of damage (mutations) being passed along to further generations, despite the best efforts of our inner DNA repair mechanisms. Males have more health problems than females, and at the rate of genetic entropy that can be observed, humans cannot be as old as Darwinists want to believe. Biblical creationists have been saying for years that Adam and Eve were genetically perfect at their creation, and when sin entered creation, the downward slide began.
A good example about how much we do not know about the chromosomes is admitted in an article in Science Daily that proclaimed:
Decoding Y chromosomes is difficult even with latest sequencing technologies. The question [of] which genes lie on the chromosome and where they came from is hotly debated.
The authors then claim that “genetic material in fruit flies is often transferred to the Y chromosome from other chromosomes. Although largely a result of ‘accidents’, some of these transfers create functional genes.”
To read the rest, click on "The Problem with Males: Y-Chromosome Degeneration".

Question Evolution Day

Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!

Friday, January 19, 2018

Noah: Man of Resolve — Book Review

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

Several months ago, I read and reviewed Noah: Man of Destiny, by Tim Chaffey and K. Marie Adams. Just before Christmas, I was pleasantly surprised that Noah: Man of Resolve was one of the e-books on sale at Answers in Genesis, so I grabbed it. I'm telling you how I obtained my copy so you know that I purchased both books and was not given promotional copies or anything. The publisher and authors probably do not even know that I exist, let alone that I am writing reviews.

Noah: Man of Resolve, book 2 of the Remnant Trilogy" by Tim Chaffey and K. Marie AdamsIt has been made clear that this is a trilogy, as seen in part of the name, "The Remnant Trilogy". (See how that works?) I suspicion that all three  were written as one large book and then separated into sections. I'm thinking that because the authors don't have continuity errors from book one to book two, which are more likely to happen when authors spend a lot of time off in their writing. Also, books one and two have "a glimpse of" preview of the next book in the volume you'd be holding in your mitts. Plus the fact that the second book takes up precisely where the first one left off, and has some tense action sequences.

Noah:Man of Destiny had some editing problems early on, but those were confined to early chapters, and I did not notice any glaring errors in this book. Each of the first two books is slightly under 300 pages, which includes extras after the main novels. More about those extras later.

Man of Destiny established characters and conflicts, and there was a bit of romance where Noah met and married the missus. Man of Resolve continues with character development and shows us that Noah was indeed a man of resolve, as were some of his friends. We are given some rather emotional moments of rage, tragic loss, and committed love.

Although a work of fiction, the authors were very concerned with staying true to what we know in Scripture, but also using artistic license to tell the story. People are abandoning faith in the Creator and turning to a satanic substitute that wicked people and the "Seer" are promoting. Wickedness is increasing, as we read in Genesis 6:5. 

There is no profanity, and while sexual immorality is becoming rampant, it is only mentioned. However, there is more violence in this book than the last, and some of it is a bit graphic — may be disturbing to younger and more sensitive readers. The violence is not gratuitous or given excessive detail, and I've seen worse on network television. Let me add that I've read secular books that had violence that was necessary to the storyline that have put me off from continuing. This is nowhere near that intense, you savvy?

These books are necessarily full of reasonable creationary speculations about the pre-Flood world's conditions, animals, people, and so on. Again, the authors are careful not to violate what is clearly stated in the Bible. They also explain themselves in the extras: "Behind the Fiction, "Answering Questions Raised by the Novel", "Encounter This", and "Borrowed from the Bible". Here, we see that the authors did a great deal of research and simply did not spin a fun yarn. Even the names of some characters were carefully chosen, and other names were studiously avoided. Working at and researching for the Ark Encounter worked both ways, helping both the exhibits and the novels. Several questions were deliberately raised by the authors to provoke thought in the readers, and to show that some people have unscriptural opinions about Noah, the Ark, and his time. 

One slightly negative thought is that Noah and his wife seemed a mite underwhelmed when he learned about the Flood and having to build the Ark. Seemed a bit like, "Wow, that's too bad". However, the astonishing news only happened once in history, so how could they deal with it? I'm sure that more about their reactions and feelings will be developed in the third volume.

I recommend Noah: Man of Resolve. It is a good story with theological support, faithfulness to the Bible, and gives people things to think about and discuss. Be aware that this second volume is not a "stand alone"; you'd best be reading the first book before getting into this one so it makes more sense. From the "That's the Biz, Sweetheart" department, I have to wait a few more months before commencing to read the final volume, which will be released in about five months.

Question Evolution Day

Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!

Thursday, January 18, 2018

The Hard Side of Flour

That white, fluffy stuff found in most kitchens known as flour can be fun, especially when it is used to make something edible. I like that part. You can also play detective and sprinkle it on the ground to see who is intruding. Doesn't work too well in a brightly-lit room, though. You can also make glue with it.

"But Cowboy Bob, I have a gluten allergy!"

Was it properly diagnosed, or did you form an opinion? People cannot pretend to be doctors, so do not self-diagnose, old son, and do not eat the glue. Anyway, this post is about something more solid: petrified flour.

Flour was petrified, and it did not take millions of years to do it
Credit: Pixabay / Julia Schwab
Creationists share stories and articles about various items that turned to stone or something. Unfortunately, they don't check their sources. Some items may be valid, but when in doubt, go without. I suspicion that the reason some folks bring these up is to make the valid point that petrification, like fossilization, requires proper conditions, not long ages. These conditions are explained by the Genesis Flood.

Sacks of flour can be seen that were petrified. No, not horribly frightened, but actually turned to stone. That's the real meaning of the word, you see. And it shows quite clearly that Darwin years are unnecessary.
The oblong rocks at the Eureka Springs Gardens in Arkansas, USA, bring a curious smile to passing tourists, once they inspect them closely.
Grey and smooth, the rocks have a fabric imprint, resembling coarse canvas sacking. They look remarkably like sacks of flour! The bottom of one sack is elongated and even preserves a pattern of stitching. The top is pulled together, complete with petrified wrinkles, as if it was once tied with rope.
To read the rest of this short but interesting article, click on "Petrified Flour". You may also want to see the short video below on petrified wood.

Question Evolution Day

Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Geologic Boundary and Evolution Dispute

The hands at the Darwin Ranch tell stories in the bunkhouse, especially about what they call mass extinctions. Their favorite is the story about how a huge rock fell out of the sky, making the Chicxulub crater and making the dinosaurs and a passel of other critters go extinct some 65 million Darwin years ago. Except for the dinosaurs that managed to evolve into birds, and for some other lucky beasts (yes, evolutionists believe in luck) that went on about their business. I reckon mass extinctions are choosy about who gets to be made extinct, huh?

Genetics and geology disagreements over what evolved when at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.
Asteroid And Earth image credit: FreeDigitalPhotos.net / Idea go
According to secular geologists and their compromising Churchian allies, there is a boundary between these alleged geological periods, the Cretaceous and the Paleogene. Tempers flare and quarreling occurs in the bunkhouse after guzzling pulque, since not all evolutionists believe that birds evolved into dinosaurs. More importantly, there is disagreement between genetic results and geology for what evolved when. I've got news for you, pilgrims, nothing evolved in the goo-to-geologist fashion, because life was created. Recently, too. That's why biblical creation science Genesis Flood models fit the observed data far better than the contrivances of secularists.
Evolution’s speculative story is filled with fanciful tales explaining natural phenomena that are actually best explained by the Bible’s narrative of history. Huge graveyards of fossilized plants and animals are found the world over in water-deposited sandstone, limestone, and shale rocks. Clearly, this is evidence of the global catastrophic deluge recorded in Genesis. To counter this, evolutionists concoct stories based on multiple extinction events to explain changes in the fossils found in strata.
To read the rest, click on "Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary Shenanigans".
Question Evolution Day

Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Oldest Fossil Microbes?

Remember the big deal in 1996 when it was announced that life was discovered on Mars? Sure you do. It was microbes. Remember how scientists later decided that it was not life after all? Sure you do. No, wait. Bad news for Darwin seldom gets a mention from the secular lapdog media. Well, it seems like people would learn from their mistakes. That'll be the day! They're saddling up and riding for the Darwin brand again.

Supposedly fossilized microbes were dated at 3.465 million years, but many problems exist
Credit: Pixabay / Gerd Altmann
A scientist announced finding fossilized microbes that were dated at 3.465 million years. Kind of precise, don't you think? I'm suspicious. This same scientist resorted to "stasis" as an explanation for allegedly ancient microbes that showed no signs of evolving.


Here, he has to demonstrate that the only explanation for what was found was that it is life, and not something else in nature mimicking live. You savvy? Only the life explanation is allowed. Even if he was right, that he had actual fossils, they were microbes, and very old, then he runs into other very serious problems based on evolutionary dogma. Of course, evolutionists can change their stories when facts intrude and narratives conflict. Biblical creationists cannot change the truth. We don't have to, because the truth of creation and a young earth is on our side from the get-go.
Are these fossils 3.465 billion years old? Are they even fossils? Serious questions need to be asked when the news gets excited about world records for oldest life on Earth.
Dr William Schopf has made a career out of looking for the oldest microfossils on Earth. We saw him making other evolutionists worry about extreme stasis that must have been true for some of his fossils, given the dates (6/30/15). Earlier that year, he mumbled and fumbled about the need to explain the lack of evolution in his fossils. He decided that if organisms stay the same, evolution is true, or if they evolve quickly, then evolution is true—a retreat into the Stuff Happens Law. Last year, he reported remains of proteins from Precambrian rocks in the Gunflint Chert in Canada. Now, he is reporting the world’s oldest microfossils at 3.465 billion years old from the Apex Chert in Australia (Science Daily). Apparently Darwin Years, constructed as they are out of silly putty, can be specified to four significant figures.
To read the rest, click on "Evaluating Claims of Oldest Fossil Microbes".

Question Evolution Day

Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!