Dating Problems with Fossil Footprints
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgejoli4kg9NZDtz_CMDULybERrHbVHi8MbxEYsjhqTv1-ZZp8P3TBR6kjSDNypeys3QVUfZB3qmRirl_0MCU6OjXRAsXqWhA_PmyxzQtdIGFV5YGOm93TZhH56QoEbr3Cxnw4weGAm4360dqZWUza9iSW7zz85zzfxBj_nE2KYjlc7UsKq_xjNseZLv8E/s320/Fossil%20footprints,%20White%20Sands%20National%20Park%20%20NPS%20photo%20(usage%20does%20not%20imply%20endorsement),%20modified%20at%20PhotoFunia.jpg)
Down New Mexico way, a traveler can find White Sands National Park . Lots of big dunes comprised of gypsum. Have you ever gone sand sledding? That and other National Park activities like camping, hiking trails, stargazing and such are there. Also, fossilized footprints. They had mammoths, giant sloths, and many creatures in what was once a much nicer climate. Yes, there are human footprints as well. Assigning dates to them are a vexation to secular scientists because the results conflict with the narrative of when humans were supposed to live there. Fossil footprints, White Sands National Park / NPS photo (usage does not imply endorsement), modified at PhotoFunia Scientists are disagreeing about the carbon dating results, which showed that humans were in North America sooner than secular views expect and conflicts with the evolutionary story. Radiometric dating is dependent on assumptions , so the carbon dating used on relevant plants can be adjusted to more convenient levels. The sam