No Transitional Forms in the Fossil Record
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKYNoQnoMx0QcpfBXVgZt0wtQa_CGB_1aMOvMYnqY77FwM01zJWVwkiWFkLgKmqqx6qu7_kUwV2MjNnAjIvmT37FyXhGLkzHcnT8VIbaOgUpt6e3Ggh25LEJ2Cx94RPncQsFJE8ZDqDtg/s1600/246400_fossil_trilobites_2.jpg)
I’ve tried putting a simple question to various people and groups of people: “Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing that you think is true?” I tried that question on the geology staff in the Field Museum of Natural History, and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago … and all I got there was silence for a long time, and then eventually one person said: “Yes, I do know one thing. It ought not to be taught in high school.” — Colin Patterson Fundamentalist evolutionists insist that the fossil record proves macroevolution is true. Creationists cite evolutionists who say that there are no transitional forms, then get accused of quote mining . Damage control! Then, the evolutionary faithful will trot out pictures of fossils, say that there are many transitional forms, and paste material from angry anti-creationist sites like talk.origins (they should check out tru