Sea Dragon Troubles Evolution

Posted by -

Crappie Crankbait from the Darwin Ranch specializes in ancient aquatic reptiles, and he was giving a lecture in town. It was a follow up to his ichthyosaur talk, this time about mosasaurs. Dr. Crankbait gave old talking points about the critters.

Yes, these reptiles were big, about 50 feet or 15 meters long. Their order is Squamata because they are supposedly related to lizards that left land and returned to the sea. It has been assumed that mosasaurs were poor swimmers. When I publicly asked how anyone knows these things, Dr. Crankbait ignored me.

Mosasaurus hoffmannii skeleton (cropped and adjusted), Wikimedia Commons / Ghedoghedo (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Down Mississippi way in the spring of 2025, researchers found a sizeable sea dragon. Some of Darwin's acolytes get on the prod when I point out that evolutionists have presuppositions. Then some insist that creationists are the ones who do that, not "scientists." (That is, no true scientist questions evolution.) But the research is chock full of them, especially deep time.

Also, since this specimen is so well preserved, tissues were also discovered. Those were evosplained because they indicate that dinosaurs and other creatures did not die out millions of years ago. Try as secularists might, evidence of evolution is still missing, and mosasaurs were created for the environments in which they lived.
Recently, “researchers may have discovered Mississippi’s largest ever mosasaur after pulling a Cretaceous-aged fossil out of a riverbed south of Starkville.” It was, of course, a huge 100% mosasaur, not an evolutionary ancestor. In addition, it was merely buried in sediments labeled as Cretaceous System rocks. It didn’t really live millions of years ago. The Cretaceous is simply one layer within the thick Flood rocks found all over the globe.

But paleontologist Michael Polcyn states mosasaurs are somehow an example of large-scale evolution.

You can read the full article at "The Mosasaur: A Giant Sea Dragon."