Search This Blog

Piltdown Superman

Welcome to the home of The Question Evolution Project. Presenting information demonstrating that there is no truth in minerals-to-man evolution, and providing evidence for special creation.
—Established by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

I Found Your Car, Cowboy Bob!

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

By Piltdown Superman - December 17, 2011

Great! How did you know it was my car?

Click for larger image

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

StatCounter

Featured Post

The Peppered Moth: Icon for Creation

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

By Cowboy - July 30, 2021

Through indoctrination classes, Darwinian propaganda documentaries, and other places, many people have heard of how peppered moths were solid evidence for evolution. Light moths on dark backgrounds became bird chow while dark moths did well. Indeed, H.B. Kettlewell said that the Bearded Buddha would have been happy to see this. However, Kettlewell was a #liar4darwin. Despite the fraud in his videos and photos, this fake news is still in textbooks. (So are the fraudulent embryonic recapitulation drawings by Haeckel the Jackal.) I am once again asking why, if there is so much solid evidence for the "fact" of evolution, do they need dishonesty to promote it? 1931 peppered moth image source: Flickr / Ben Sale ( CC BY 2.0 ) As will be demonstrated in the following two articles, natural selection is not evolution . Was Kettlewell potted when he made his claim? There was no added genetic information, no vertical evolution — peppered moths did not evolve into something else. (A vi

Pages

Home
Statement of Faith
Evolution and the New Atheo-Fascism
The Question Evolution Project
Logic Lessons
Willingly Deceived by Evolution
Creation Links
Question Evolution Day

Evolution and the New Atheo-Fascism

By Bob Sorensen - May 17, 2014

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen A large difficulty in researching and writing this article is that of definitions. It is important to have precise definitions when people can understand words and concepts in different ways 1 , and this article involves words with various meanings and connotations. There has been a noticeable increase in vitriol from the so-called "new" atheists (often followers of Dawkins, Harris, Dennett, Hitchens, Shermer, Nye, Krauss and others) and from evolutionists toward Christians and creationists. (I am making distinctions here because not all evolutionists are atheists, and not all Christians are creationists.) Some of us speculate that adherents of the religion of atheism 2 ,which has evolution as one of its cornerstones, feel threatened because evolution's flaws are exposed by Intelligent Design and creation science. This battle is not simply intellectual, but also spiritual. From a biblical Christian perspective, atheists realize that God e

Misotheists Dehumanizing Christians and Creationists

By Piltdown Superman - November 21, 2020

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Making fun of an institution through satire and parody can be found throughout millennia to illustrate perceived absurdities of belief systems. These are used for various targets, but the most common seem to be political or religious. C. Richard Dawkins ridiculing Ray Comfort, image credits: Flickr / David Shankbone ( public domain ), modified with FotoSketcher So why attack individuals instead of ideas ? It seems like practically everyone does it. Just ask the uncool kids in school. This is far beyond satire or persuasion . A quote commonly (but probably erroneously) attributed to Socrates is, "When the debate is over, slander becomes the tool of the loser". This child sees a useful principle in that statement. Although it is common to encounter proponents of atheistic naturalism ridiculing biblical creationists in rallies, books, videos, and so on, it is greatly intensified on social(ist) media. With the option of anonymity, attacks increase with

Discerning Fake Science

By Piltdown Superman - November 14, 2020

Unfortunately, I have to keep gnawing on this bone: scientists are people, too. They make mistakes and have biases. As such, they are not the impartial arbiters of truth and science that many people believe. Many want to do science, others manipulate data for their own agendas. Since nobody is a blank slate and everyone has some kind of bias, it follows that nobody is completely impartial. Try to present creation science materials to atheists and other evolutionists, they often cry, "But that's biased! Those liars for Jesus are trying to convince us of their views!" Brilliant, Sherlock! Doesn't everyone want to present an argument to convince others of their point of view? Also, the ad hominem is entirely irrational — not only from it being a logical fallacy, but also because biblical creationists serve a holy God who requires righteousness and hates lying. To say that we are lying to get others to believe in God is utterly vacuous. As mentioned several times before,

"DisMANtled" Movie and Creationists' Money

By Bob Sorensen - October 03, 2020

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen It is common for Christians and creationists to be dry gulched by those with Atheism Spectrum Disorder who will say something like, "Yeah, those so-called ministries are getting rich of gullible idiots like you!" Such a comment is based on bigotry as well as ignorance. Plus a good deal of atheistic hypocrisy. Original Dismantled image courtesy of Back2Genesis (enhanced) I remember a preacher talking about money and someone said that he must have a lot of money in the bank. He responded that he had a lot of money going through the bank. Faith-based organizations, like many secular outfits, rely on contributions and merchandise sales to pay the bills. Do executive directors make large salaries? Sometimes. On the other hand, many pastors struggle to pay their own bills . Although creation ministries seek contributions and sales, most are not motivated by greed. This section will be outdated in a couple of weeks, but the purpose of the artic

That "Living in a Computer Simulation" Thing Again

By Cowboy - December 16, 2020

Just over a year ago, we discussed the notion that some people have that we are living in a computer simulation (" Evolutionary Thinking and Fake Reality "). A recent article made some interesting points about this, so I reckon it is worth saddling this pony up again. Credit: FreeDigitalImages / thesomeday1234 "Hey, gang! Pet the neighbors and wake the cat, we're going to do a computer simulation of an entire universe!" That would require substantial knowledge of the workings of every aspect of the universe, but there is a great deal more to learn. I reckon the idea is self-defeating right from the start. Also note that those who believe in such things are materialists. That is, they reject God, the soul, and that sort of thing. Ironically, secular scientists search for the locations of the soul and free will in the brain . There are people who want to develop the simulation technology for the "betterment of humanity" or somesuch (that should be a red