Defining the Dinosaur Fuzz

Paleontologists see what appears to be fuzz in dinosaur fossils, so they tell a tale of protofeathers. Since most evolutionists believe that dinosaurs evolved into birds, the story needs plot points. If dinosaurs had feathers, they must have originated from something, so this possible fuzz is mow protofeathers.

They keep majoring on minors, tap dancing around numerous fundamental flaws in their scenario. F'rinstance, the skeletal compositions between birds and dinosaurs are radically different. Also, feathers have specified complexity and there are different feathers for different functions.

Fuzzy T. rex made with AI Image Generator

What would dinofuzz do for the animal? Make it cute? Mayhaps scientists could venture further into Making Things Up™ and give dinofuzz and "evolutionary purpose", such as a defense mechanism because it tickles predators. It may have been for warmth. When looked at in just the right way, it could resemble hair, so they were going to evolve into mammals! Sure, why not? Chemical analysis does not help matters; dinofuzz is not protofeathers. Rest assured that these owlhoots will keep on denying that the evidence points to recent Creation.

Despite major problems showing dinosaur evolution into birds, the dinosaur theory is still being supported by most evolutionists. Thus, assuming this theory is correct, scales must have evolved into feathers. The problem for evolution is described by the author of a new study by evolutionists at the University of Geneva led by Dr Michel Milinkovitch:

The rest of the article is located at "Dinosaur Fuzz Is Not Protofeathers."