Evolutionists Still Revising Ancestor Ages

A fossil from Scotland named Westlothiana lizziae received press because it supposedly represents an ancestor for many tetrapods, but the claim has major problems. For one thing, it cannot be supported in paleontology. Secularists blind the public with science, and people think that evolutionists are clever.

W. lizziae was not given a precise age before, but Darwin's disciples were able to massage data and make assumptions to get an age that they wanted. It now lands in a hole in the fossil record.

Old Man of Storr, Portree, UK, Unsplash / Diane Rish

This hole is called Romer's Gap, where in allegedly millions of years, few fossils are found. (Apparently Darwin's Flying Monkeys™ who frequent social(ist) media and say that there are no gaps in the fossil record have not heard of this.) The transitional form is nowhere near complete, and the dating is forced into the desired place.

An allegedly vital piece of animal evolution was first discovered in 1984 in Scotland. Conventional scientists suggested the fossil of Westlothiana lizziae, a lizard-like reptile, is an example of an early stem tetrapod.

However, due to the fragmentary nature of the W. lizziae fossil, some evolutionists are unsure of Westlothiana’s phylogenetic (evolutionary) position. Regardless, a SciTechDaily article confidently stated that, “Along with other early stem tetrapods, [W. lizziae] represents a common ancestor of all modern amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, including humans.”

To finish reading, head on over to "Yet Another Revised Age for the Land-Animal Ancestor."