Biogeography Still Bothers Evolutionists

In a recent discussion on Folly Road with Sherwood Tellit of the Darwin Ranch, I was informed that the evolutionary story (or "fact," as he called it) explains biogeography quite nicely. It is the study of how plants and animals migrated over the years: "How did that get there?"

Superficially, evolution may seem plausible for the migrations of organisms. When one engages the think bones and actually considers what is observed — and asks questions — then the whole thing starts to unravel.

Globe from top, Pexels / NastyaSensei

A problem for Darwinists is that they often insist that things like biogeography, speciation, natural selection and other things are proof of evolution. Not hardly! Biblical creationists also believe those things. Scoff all they want, but questions raised about evolutionary biogeography are have better answers in creation science Genesis Flood models!

In March 2010, internationally renowned atheist Richard Dawkins addressed the Global Atheist Convention in Melbourne, Australia. He said, “The pattern of geographical distribution [of plants and animals] is just what you would expect if evolution had happened.”1 He then went on to say that the distribution is “not what you would expect on certain alternative ideas … like if they had all dispersed from Noah’s Ark.”

However, a closer look at the science of biogeography (the study of the distributions of plants and animals) reveals a very different picture to the one Professor Dawkins painted.

For the rest, click on "Plants and animals around the world — Why are they found where they are?" You may also like "Monkeys Rafting the Atlantic Ocean?"