Piltdown Superman

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Darwinists keep refuting themselves in the foot by attempting to define intangible things with empirical methods. This time, they are trying again to grapple with morality, specifically with lying. Why do we do it, when is it wrong, when is it right, and (get out your Charles Darwin Club Secret Decoder Ring™) how lying evolved.  Composed at Image Chef Keep in mind that these sidewinders have hijacked science to promote pantheistic evolutionism, and are living up to their abysmal standards such as "survival of the fittest" and "the end justifies the means" (especially in science education , why lying is acceptable). Since they are materialists, things like logic, the soul, and morality cannot be determined through their systems. By doing so, they are riding onto the Metaphysics Trail and outside of the empirical sciences they claim to uphold. Let's take a side trail of our own, if'n y'all don't mind. What is lying? S

When watching movies where indigenous people were attacking, hunting, or driving off enemies, I noticed something resembling a long trough used to launch a dart, arrow, or spear. Seemed silly to me, just throw the spear. I was dreadfully wrong on that. Although it looked awkward, the tool became an extension of the arm and gave more power to the projectile. This made it possible for womenfolk and young'uns to get into the act. When you had a group of people on the prod who were skilled in using those tools, you'd better get out of Dodge mighty quick-like! Credit: Wikimedia Commons / Richard Keatinge ( CC BY-SA 3.0 ) I was uncomfortable using a photo where people could be recognized, so I blurred the facts even though the original image does not do this. There are several names and styles, and simple enough that you can make your own atlatl . Interesting that these spear-throwing devices are very similar, and can be found in 'Straya and the Americas, among other pla

Secular astronomers and a few vacillating creationists believe in that elusive stuff called dark matter. It supposedly makes up the overwhelming majority of the stuff in the universe, but dark matter has never been seen, nor has any evidence for its existence been decisively indicated. I'll allow that some astronomers insist that dark matter has been indicated, but they set up a consequent to affirm and ignore other possibilities for explanations. Image credits: Credit: X-ray: NASA /CXC/Univ of Missouri/M.Brodwin et al; Optical: NASA/STScI; Infrared: JPL/Caltech (Usage does not imply endorsement of site contents) Many tests for dark matter have been set up, but they keep jumping the fence. An 80-day experiment by Chinese scientists was a spectacular failure where the PandaX detector thumbed its nose at researchers. They get mighty disappointed when failing to detect something that probably doesn't exist in the first place. Cosmic evolution fails again. Since dark

As biblical creationists, we realize that our young Earth, creation-affirming, evolution-defying views raise ire and eyebrows. People who claim to believe in intellectual honesty and inquiry tend to reject creationary views out of hand. Others, however, want to understand our point of view. Indeed, we know that creation science raises many questions, especially for those who have been indoctrinated in materialism and atheistic interpretations of science. Credit: Pixabay / Jeff Jacobs One fair question is why we don't find a passel of fossils from the antediluvian world. After all, many creationists believe that the earth was not exactly sparse in the population category, so where are they? Related to this is the idea that artifacts, and possibly entire cities, from before the Flood would be (or have been) discovered — haven't they? While there is no direct biblical reason to think there cannot be fossils or artifacts, inferences can be made from Scripture. However, th

Watching one of those medical shows the other night, the word hemoglobin was used. It is a common word, but some of us simply know that it is something important that has to do with blood, and then move on. Hemoglobin is a protein in red blood cells that takes oxygen to cells that need oxygen. That's a lot of cells, and specified complexity. Of course, Darwinoids want to tell us how it evolved. Credit: Wikimedia Commons / Zephyris ( CC BY-SA 3.0 ) The Master Engineer put hemoglobin in a wide range of creatures. Evolutionists are unable to appeal to the fossil record and their self-serving dating methods, so they try other methods. The evolsplaining methods fail, because of so many creatures have the stuff, and the imaginary common ancestor cannot be envisioned. Wherever hemoglobin is found, it is the same, and doing the same work. No evolution here, pal. Darwinists tried using duplication and translocation, but those ideas only make things worse. How about admitting that t

If you head down south in Asia, south of Vietnam, Burma, and such, you'll reach an ocean and get your feet wet. Lots of islands and island nations down thataway, and you can find the third largest island in the world: Borneo. A skull was discovered in a Niah cave a few decades ago, and an evolutionary anthropologist examined it, and some jasper got the notion to call it "Deep Skull". This skull was classified, and people accepted the pronouncements that it was of a teenage boy from further down south, below Australia, of Tasmania. Other evolutionists were satisfied, since an authority examined some skull fragments and treated his words as ex cathedra. The dogma for that part of the alleged human evolutionary timeline was established. Rein 'er in there, Hoss! Maybe they were thinking how many papers passed peer review that could not be replicated , or someone simply got the notion to give the skull a modern examination. Whatever the reason, the skull research

If you ride out Folly Road past Stinking Lake (not as bad as it sounds), then head northwest to Deception Pass, you can find the Darwin Ranch. The Winkie Guards are none to fond of sightseers, though. The ranch hands have been in a somber mood lately because genetic clock research is backfiring on their evolutionary research. You'd think they'd have learned from previous experiences . Derived from images at Clker clipart Genetic clocks are a study of DNA variations and how long an organism has supposedly been around. When plugging data into evolutionary presuppositions and deep time assumptions, scientists obtain conflicting results that do not fit their timelines. Using an empirical approach, results are right in keeping with biblical creation science timelines. A massive new genetic study by secular scientists analyzed the DNA of over 100,000 animal species using about five million DNA sequences. Researchers at The Rockefeller University and the University of Basel f