Welcome to the home of The Question Evolution Project. Presenting information demonstrating that there is no truth in minerals-to-man evolution, and presenting evidence for special creation. —Established by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Evolution and Elephant Tusks

In the book King Solomon's Mines, there's a violent scene about elephant hunting where one of the Zulu assistants was killed by an elephant that the group had been shooting:
Umbopa stood contemplating the huge dead elephant and the mangled remains of poor Khiva.

"Ah, well," he said presently, "he is dead, but he died like a man!"
What? What is "died like a man", other than a subjective opinion? They were killing for sport and for the ivory of the tusks. People had different views in 1907, but the international ivory trade is illegal for good reason! The character had a stupid death. That's my subjective opinion, anyway.

On a lighter note, Groucho Marx said something ir-relephant to this topic:



"Is there a point to this, Cowboy Bob?"

Actually, there is. Elephants are losing their tusks to some extent.


Elephants are losing their tusks, and evolutionists are claiming that this loss of a trait is evidence *for* evolution.
Image credit: cropped from Freeimages / fabrizio colombo
Because of hunting and such (a variation on natural selection), tusks are fading. Amazingly, Darwinists are claiming that this is evidence of evolution. Not hardly! Evolution is the acquiring new traits through added genetic information. Evidence does not support evolution, but what is observed supports what is to be expected from the biblical account.
Elephants’ tusks are getting shorter—with an increasing proportion of the elephant population even being completely tuskless—and it’s widely being heralded as ‘evolution’ and ‘Darwinism in action’.

Outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins refers to the phenomenon in his book, The Greatest Show on Earth—the evidence for evolution, in the chapter titled “Before our very eyes”. The speed of the change has surprised many. Dawkins points out in that chapter that “Darwin himself picked out [elephants] as one of the slowest-reproducing animals, with one of the longest generation turnovers” and he opines that, in reference to the speedy reduction in tusk size, “We would not expect to see it within one human lifetime.”
To read the rest, click on "Why the elephant is losing its tusks (and it’s not evolution!)

 
Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!

Labels