It was a propaganda tool for evolution and millions of years, but I think they were simply using what was commonly accepted as science, though it was historical science with some speculative operational science added to the story. Neat idea about extracting DNA from amber, though.
![]() |
stock.xchng/EdwinP |
Read the rest of the article, encased at "DNA in Amber Doesn't Last Long".Claims of ancient DNA hundreds of thousands of years old may be false. No DNAwas found in an insect encased in amber said to be 10,600 years old.The article on Science Daily suggests that a study published in PLoS ONE puts the “final nail in the coffin” of Jurassic Park’s thesis that dinosaurs could be reconstructed from fossilized DNA in amber. Researchers from the University of Manchester looked for DNA in Colombian copal, the resin precursor of amber. Using “sensitive next-generation methods”, they obtained sequences a few hundred bases in length, but could not match them to the insects. They concluded, therefore, that they are artifacts. The abstract states,
Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!