![]() |
Astronomy / Gentile da Fabriano, ca. 1400s |
However, there is a tremendous amount of observed data produced while working in astrobiology. If scientists wanted to do something productive, they could drop Darwin on the trial and ride on with their observations. Of course, a name change would be in order.
To continue reading, click on "How Astrobiology Could Be Scientific".Despite its propensity for wild speculation about life in space, there’s one way Astrobiology could provide useful science.Our Darwin Dictionary defines astrobiology as equivalent to “bio-astrology,” because of its penchant for wild speculation. The new “science” that emerged in the 1990s after NASA announced bogus claims of fossil life in a Mars meteorite is nearly 30 years old, still without a shred of evidence for life beyond the Earth. There’s still no “bio” in astrobiology; that’s why it reduces to astrology. And yet its whole raison d’etre was to find evidence for life – even simple, microbial life. (This distinguishes it from SETI, which searches for intelligent life.)
Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!