Scrapping Neo-Darwinism for Something Else?

Posted by -

Proponents of minerals-to-musician evolution are passionate about their beliefs, often refusing to admit that biblical creationists have pointed out many problems in the current story. Some folks have said that scientists are in agreement about evolution, but disagree about details. That remark is self-refuting if you study on it.

Also, there are scientists who admit that there are serious difficulties, which has been known for many years. Darwin's disciples ignore those comments or accuse creationists of "quote mining." However, they fail to show that we are misusing the quotes.

Pond, Unsplash / Cowboy Bob Sorensen (cropped)
While many evolutionary scientists seem to go with the flow and think what they are told (but criticizing the predominant paradigm can end a career), some have enough standing to speak their radical ideas. While biblical creationists show that evidence supports a creation orchard instead of Darwin's Tree of Life, it has been said that evolutionary trees could be wrong; the evidence does not add up for them.

There is speculation that an entirely new theory of evolution should be made. Notice, though, they are committed to naturalism. Few question evolution itself, even though the logical conclusion for the evidence they see is that there is a Creator, and he is described in the Bible. These things should be a wake-up call to theistic evolutionists who dance with the devil in the pale moonlight.
Recently, there have been some surprising confessions from people committed to the prevalent view of origins. This, of course, is neo-Darwinian evolution, the idea that beneficial genetic mutations arising over deep time have provided the raw material for Darwinian natural selection. In this manner, evolutionists say that random errors in the DNA, coupled with the survival of the fittest, have generated every living organism on the planet, from diatoms to dunnocks, yeasts to yaks, and pneumococci to naval architects. The headings in this article are all direct quotations from evolutionists that have appeared recently.

It would be in your best interest to continue reading "Irresolvable problems with Neo-Darwinism—experts calling for a new theory of evolution." You'll thank me later. Also, consider "Evolutionists Disillusioned with Evolutionary Stories."