Scientists Unintentionally Admit Core of Earth is Designed

Posted by -

It is obvious that the secular science industry is opposed to intelligent design, and C. Richard Dawkins set forth a kind of mantra that living things only appear designed. (Indeed, a paper was retracted for using the word creator.) Astronomers, geologists and others adhere to the same anti-Creator bias.

Every once in a while, the Darwin Ranch (out yonder near Deception Pass) is infiltrated by words of design. This is not because creationists managed to slip in their scientific material. Sometimes, secularists slip up. It happened in a paper about the earth's core.

Secular scientists oppose the idea of intelligent design, but occasionally they slip up and admit to it. This happened regarding the core of the earth.
Earth's core diagram, NASA / Dixon Rohr (public domain)
The core of our planet is baffling to scientists, as it cannot be observed through empirical means. Its composition is inferred through various methods. While some scientists have suggested that the solid inner core should not exist because of the lack of deep-time conditions needed for its formation, others stay with the narrative. 

Authors of one paper unintentionally admitted that since the geological evolution of the inner core is a conundrum, it appears to have been designed. You betcha! Our Creator did that, and did it recently, so no wonder secularists are befuddled and the hands at the Darwin Ranch have to resort to the scientific principle of Making Things Up™.
Researchers, Wilson et al from the University of Oxford, Leeds, and University College London, simulated the conditions required for Earth’s solid inner core to form, resulting in it’s present structure, temperature and magnetism. After testing numerous combinations of elements, the team found that core nucleation and crystallization would only occur with precisely 3.8% carbon in its makeup; otherwise, Earth’s core would have remained molten.

Comparative simulations showed that no other elemental mix could sustain a stable magnetic field, leaving the planet vulnerable to solar wind and charged particles—potentially even stripping away its atmosphere. Despite beginning from evolutionary assumptions of an initially molten core—and acknowledging unaccounted complexities—Wilson et al.’s research nonetheless points powerfully to fine-tuned design and raises fresh challenges to long-standing evolutionary views on Earth’s core formation.

You can read the entire article at "Earth’s Core Is Fine-Tuned for Surface Habitability."