Welcome to the home of The Question Evolution Project. Presenting information demonstrating that there is no truth in minerals-to-man evolution, and presenting evidence for special creation. —Established by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Pterodactyl Ptroubles Ptimeline Ptales

Evolution is conjecture about the past using some scientific applications in an attempt to justify presuppositions. Secular scientists start with an a priori commitment to their evolutionary worldview. In areas of real science, a theory or hypothesis is modified or rejected in the face of compelling contrary evidence. With evolutionism, however, facts are modified to fit the so-called theory.


PD
This is clearly illustrated in the case of a fossil pterodactyloid that was discovered in China. Paleontologists wanted to plug it into a place in their timeline and say it was a "progenitor" of older creatures. However, they also say it was probably capable of flight. So, they tell tales and force-fit the facts into their preconceptions. It makes far more sense to admit that they were created, and created far more recently than their existing paradigms will allow.
Fragments of a pterodactyloid fossil from China indicate it was fully capable of powered flight, despite being called a “progenitor” of the others.

If all airplanes evolved from a flying, powered airplane, where did the airplane come from? A similar question might be asked about Kryptodrakon progenitor, a new fossil pterodactyloid (the group including pterodactyls and pterosaurs) found in China. The newly discovered creature, claimed to be 5 million years older than all other known pterodactyloids, appears from the artist’s reconstruction to be fully fledged for flight, just like the later ones. How, then, can it be called a “progenitor”?
You can read the rest at "Pterodactyloid Progenitor Was Already Advanced".



Looking for a comment area?
You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!

Labels