![]() |
Fine print fail (lower right), made on imgur, URL added later |
Another level of labeling is when creation science is referred to as "pseudoscience" peddling "junk science". As I said earlier, anti-creationists are willing to lie for Darwin for their purposes.
Here's another science denier, who has no excuse for this mendacious comment:
![]() |
Used under Fair Use provisions for educational purposes |
It is interesting that a major secular science publication is warning against the overuse of the expression "anti-science". More interesting is the way they use labels themselves and display their double standards.
To finish reading, click on "Anti-Science Label Can Be Misused".The world’s leading science journal warns its members to beware of the anti-science label.The Editorial in Nature this week warns, “Beware the anti-science label.” The reason? “Presenting science as a battle for truth against ignorance is an unhelpful exaggeration.” reads the sub-heading. Anti-science does exist, as they point out with the disastrous policies of Trofim Lysenko in communist Russia and China, that led to the starvation of millions of people. But such cases cannot be compared with less threatening examples. The article lists several reasons why overusing or abusing the term is unjustified: