Fake News of Heart Evolution

Believers in universal common ancestor evolution are locked into their presuppositions, and those contaminate the science. They believe that evolutionary ancestors of humans included fish, and recent research shows just how interpretations of evidence are treated as if they were facts. Also, no possibilities apart from evolutionary dogma are considered.

The narrative states that jawless fish evolved into jawed fish, and this research alleges that a fossil containing a well-preserved (note, not soft tissues) heart in the Gogo formation is 380 million years old. It resembles our hearts, therefore, evolution.

We supposedly evolved from fish, and a fossilized fish heart from the Bothriolepis group is put into the evolutionary narrative. This shows limited thinking and confirmation bias.
Reconstruction of Bothriolepis canadensis, Wikimedia Commons / Nobumichi Tamura (CC BY-SA 4.0)
The fish under examination is a part of the Bothriolepis group, and the findings contradicted evolutionary beliefs because many things allegedly happened quickly, in leaps, instead of small steps. Note that they still do not have evidence to back up their story, just assumptions, inferences, and the narrative itself. The method of studying the fossil is amazing, and the fact that it exists points to rapid burial, not that slow and gradual nonsense. Of course, we cannot expect secularists to acknowledge recent creation or the masterful design of the Creator. It's more fun to have their biases confirmed.
Fact: A fossil of a modern-looking heart in a fish, showing exquisite preservation, upsets prior thinking about ancestral relationships between jawless fish and sharks.

Question: This fact is evidence for (multiple choice): A. Evolution. B. Evolution. C. Evolution. D. All the above.

Only one answer is permissible with any fossil evidence. Big Science has ruled that Darwinian evolution is the scientific consensus. It has labeled skepticism of Darwinism as pseudoscience. Pseudoscience must be censored. Why? Because as Harvard evolutionist Richard Lewontin famously said, “It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated.”

Since secular science cannot allow a “Divine foot in the door,” all evidence must be cast as support for material explanations, i.e., Darwinian evolution, preferably for human evolution. Let’s watch how this plays out in the media story of an exceptionally-preserved fossil fish from the Gogo formation in Australia they claim is 380 million Darwin Years old.

A bit of a longer introductory quote than I prefer to use, but it is necessary. To read the rest of the article, see "Gogo Darwin: Latest Evo-Hype from Heart Fossil."